Login Register

Poll reveals opposition to airport in Thames Estuary off Kent coast

By Medway News  |  Posted: October 21, 2011

Poll finds opposition to airport of the Kent coast

Comments (0)

A NATIONAL poll found most respondents oppose an international airport being built in the Thames Estuary.

The survey, carried out by market research firm ICM on behalf of Medway Council – which is against the proposals – asked 1,000 people across the UK their opinion on the issue.

Mayor of London Boris Johnson has backed the scheme, in which Heathrow would be replaced as the main flight destination into the capital, at an estimated cost of £70billion.

Opponents say the scheme is unnecessary and would have a detrimental impact on wildlife.

The poll, carried out on August 19, 20 and 21, asked 1,000 randomly-selected adults whether London needed another airport, whether £70 billion was too much to spend, and if Manston in Thanet and Birmingham should take on extra capacity.

More than three-quarters said a new airport was not needed, 81 per cent said it was too expensive, and nine out of ten said existing airports should be expanded to cope with expected demand.

Kent County Council has joined with Medway Council and the RSPB in opposition to the scheme.

Medway Council leader Cllr Rodney Chambers said: "This national survey shows that Boris Johnson is flying in the face of public opinion with his plan for an estuary airport.

"It is a proposal that has already been dismissed by the airline industry and by the Government, and this poll makes clear that no one at all sees it as a serious option.

"A Thames Estuary airport would blight huge parts of Kent and Medway, as it would need a huge amount of infrastructure to support it, and it would devastate one of Europe's most important areas for migrating wildfowl.

"An overwhelming majority of people agree it is unaffordable to spend up to £70billion on a new airport, and that improving regional airports is the right policy. Boris needs to admit it is a pie-in-the-sky idea and drop it for good."

Mr Johnson, who is seeking re-election in May and is chairman of Transport for London, has said reclaiming estuary land for runways was the most sensible solution.

His spokesman said: "London is the motor of the UK economy, and if it is to retain its position as the heartbeat of global business then a new hub airport is an absolute necessity."

Read more from Kent and Sussex Courier

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • noairportinthethamesestuary  |  October 22 2011, 5:04AM

    Alongside the RSPB and a broad coalition of millions, we are wholly opposed to the construction of an airport anywhere in the Thames Estuary because of the immense damage it would cause to the area's internationally important wildlife and the wider environment. Communities in North Kent have been here before and every time it has been rejected. We find it sad that developers, the Mayor of London, his team and others are so ill-informed about the Thames Estuary and its internationally protected wildlife habitats. The whole issue of building a new airport in or around the Thames Estuary was exhaustively investigated between 2001 and 2005 in the Governments Aviation White Paper and conclusively ruled out as an option. This decision was upheld by the High Court. No matter where you move the airport in and around the Thames Estuary the issues remain just the same. An airport would be too environmentally and ecologically damaging, too dangerous because of bird-strike, too costly, the aviation industry doesn't want it and neither does the government Friends of the North Kent Marshes